Policy & Politics

Texas Board Poised to Finalize New K–12 Social Studies Standards: What's In and What's Out

By Moms For Texas Education Staff · June 28, 2026

Texas Board Poised to Finalize New K–12 Social Studies Standards: What's In and What's Out

The Texas State Board of Education is scheduled to take a final vote on overhauled K–12 social studies standards at its June 22–26, 2026, meeting. More than 5 million Texas public school students will be affected by whatever the board finalizes this week. If adopted, these new social studies TEKS will take effect in the 2030–2031 school year and guide classroom instruction and instructional materials for years to come.

The window for public influence has essentially closed—the public testimony registration period ended June 19, and the public comment deadline was June 15 at 5:00 PM. This is the culmination of a rushed four-month revision process instead of the typical two-year timeline.

The Meeting: What's Being Decided and When

The SBOE meeting is being held at the Barbara Jordan Building in Austin, with multiple committee sessions scheduled throughout the week. The board is conducting second reading and final adoption of new K–12 social studies TEKS (Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills), the state curriculum standards that govern what teachers must teach.

The new standards implement three pieces of legislation: HB 27, HB 824, and SB 24.

HB 27 mandates that students entering ninth grade in 2026–2027 and thereafter must complete a standalone one-half credit course in personal financial literacy, separating it from economics. HB 824 requires the SBOE to adopt specific civics content for government courses, including the role of governmental officials, the voting process and election laws, eligibility requirements to run for office, Robert's Rules of Order, and elected officials who represent students at each level of government.

SB 24 (titled Educating Texas Students on the Horrors of Communism) requires age-appropriate instruction on communist regimes and ideologies for grades 4–12, including the Cultural Revolution, Great Leap Forward, Holodomor, Great Terror, Cambodian genocide, Communist Party of Cuba, and a comparison of communism versus U.S. founding principles.

The revision process included work groups, statewide educator feedback, and prior public hearings, with outstanding decisions including the handling of the Personal Financial Literacy course.

What These Standards Mean for Texas Students and Beyond

Texas is the second-largest textbook market in the nation, meaning changes to its social studies standards could reshape textbooks and curriculum materials nationwide. Instructional materials approved during IMRA Cycle 2026 will be ready for classroom implementation in the 2027–28 school year, preceding full TEKS implementation in 2030–31. The estimated fiscal impact for implementing the new standards is $245,000 for the 2026–2030 period.

Critics warn that the proposed standards present Islam only in contexts of conflict or slavery, marginalize women's and non-Western histories, and potentially make Muslim and other minority students feel unwelcome in Texas schools. "The changes are selective and distort history to enforce a single ideology on public schools," said Shaimaa Zayan of CAIR-Austin. Julia Brookins of the American Historical Association put it bluntly: "You cannot censor your way to great schools."

What's In: Biblical Stories, Founding Fathers, and Anti-Communist Instruction

The proposed TEKS adopt a chronological, comprehensive, and spiraling framework emphasizing Texas, U.S., and world history narratives across grades 3–7 and a Texas capstone course in grade 8. The new standards trace the moral development of Western Civilization from early republics like Athens and Rome through the Magna Carta to the U.S. Constitution, and include specific focus on identifying Founding Fathers and Patriot heroes such as John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson with their motivations.

The revised standards require teaching informed American patriotism through mandated study of the Declaration of Independence, Constitution, Federalist Papers, plus speeches by Frederick Douglass and Martin Luther King Jr.

The standards add emphasis on Christianity's role with the Pilgrims and recognition of Moses as a lawgiver. The board approved a statewide required reading list that includes Bible passages for every grade, with mandatory Christian content ranging from Adam and Eve to the Beatitudes and the Prodigal Son, and pairs the biblical story of Moses with Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad.

Grade-level expectations include 3rd graders explaining how Christian beliefs shape ideas about equality, 5th graders linking religious freedom to American exceptionalism, and 6th graders comparing Harriet Tubman to Moses. Staci Childs, an SBOE member from Houston, said "the draft leans too heavily on Biblical references, potentially excluding full experiences of people of color."

The standards also require teaching that George Washington relinquished power and returned to his farm, symbolizing public office as service, modeling himself after the Roman leader Cincinnatus. Republican board members amended the standards to require students to place their hands over their hearts during the Pledge of Allegiance.

What's Out: Civil Rights Movements, World Cultures, and Diverse Histories

Historians condemned draft lessons that described the forced relocation and imprisonment of Japanese families during World War II as a contribution to America's military effort. The standards initially excluded Martin Luther King Jr. from the list of required Civil Rights Movement leaders.

Proposed changes remove requirements to teach about the United Farm Workers movement, the women's liberation movement, and other civil rights movements present in the current curriculum. The draft TEKS lack direct mention of the Haitian Revolution, provide weak coverage of the Atlantic slave trade, and contain no standards on jury duty, military enlistment, why taxes are paid, or the process for amending the U.S. Constitution.

The American Historical Association stated in its professional judgment that the 2026 draft TEKS will not provide an effective foundation for K–12 history education in Texas public schools due to factual inaccuracies, omissions, and ideological bias.

The Politics Behind the Overhaul

The Texas State Board of Education is a 15-member elected body with a predominantly Republican composition, and each member represents approximately 1.8 million Texans. Recent votes on K–8 social studies standards and required reading lists including Bible stories passed on closely divided 9–4 and 9–5 party-line votes. The SBOE approved the 2026 instructional materials list by a 9–1 vote during the June meeting.

Republican members defend the standards as a corrective to what they view as cherry-picked, negative portrayals of the United States, arguing that they are championing patriotic instruction while asserting that elected board members, not content advisers, have final authority over the TEKS.

All five Democratic members called for an ethics investigation into a content advisor who received a $70,000 grant from the conservative Texas Public Policy Foundation specifically for TEKS development, citing conflict-of-interest concerns.

"The process was rushed. A process that should take two years was completed in about four months, harming both the TEKS and students," said Yolanda Chavez Leyva, a University of Texas at El Paso history professor who served as a content adviser. Levi Fiedler of Texas Freedom Network added, "The shortened timeline prevented diverse cultural voices across Texas from contributing input, leading to underrepresentation of Latino, Asian, and religious minority histories."

Texas Values, a conservative advocacy organization, has praised the SBOE's social studies TEKS revisions as preserving American civics and the Christian founding.

How to Participate—Even After the Vote

Public testimony registration for the June 22–26 meeting opened June 16, 2026, at 8:00 AM and closed June 19, 2026, at 5:00 PM, with late registration available on-site up to 30 minutes before the meeting. Testimony at the June meeting is in-person only and limited to 2 minutes per speaker.

Even after the vote, electronic copies of testimony can be submitted to testimony@sboe.texas.gov for distribution to board members. The public can also submit feedback on work group drafts via email to teks@tea.texas.gov with specified subject lines, and TEA collects and posts public feedback on the Social Studies TEKS Review page.

SBOE members can be contacted through the general office at William B. Travis Building, 1701 N. Congress Avenue, Austin, TX 78701, with media relations at (512) 463-9000 and MediaRelations@tea.texas.gov, and SBOE support at sboesupport@sboe.texas.gov. Individual members have district offices and contact information available at sboe.texas.gov.

Advocacy organizations including the American Historical Association, Texas Freedom Network, Texas State Teachers Association, and Council on American-Islamic Relations have published resources and talking points for engaging with the SBOE on social studies standards.

Why Your Voice Still Matters

The standards being finalized this week will shape how more than 5 million Texas students learn about history, civics, democracy, and their role in society—and because Texas is the second-largest textbook market in the nation, decisions made in Austin could influence curriculum used by students across the country. These standards will remain in place for years, guiding classroom instruction for an entire generation.

Whether the final standards reflect a broad, inclusive, and historically accurate curriculum or a narrow, ideologically driven vision depends on whether elected officials hear from constituents who care about public education. Even after the formal vote, sustained public engagement—contacting board members, attending future meetings, and holding elected officials accountable—remains essential to ensuring that implementation serves all Texas students. This is how democracy works: not through passive observation, but through citizens showing up, speaking up, and insisting that public institutions serve the public good.